Look, the ABA agrees with me

CNN.com – ABA: Bush violating Constitution – Jul 24, 2006

A little while back I wrote about how some people thought President Bush’s signing statements might be overstepping the bounds of his position:

Honestly, when you have prominent Republicans like Specter saying that our Republican President is overstepping his bounds, we’re all in trouble.

And now the American Bar Association, which might know a thing or two about the law, says that, sure enough, President Bush is doing “grave harm to the separation of powers doctrine”.

Perhaps more worrisome is that those very same people who may lose power to the President are backing him in this.

The ABA report said President Reagan was the first to use the statements as a strategic weapon, and that it was encouraged by then-administration lawyer Samuel Alito — now the newest Supreme Court justice.

That suggests that the Supreme Court might not fight back very hard if something relating to this pracitce came across their respective desks.  It also means that the signing statements might carry more weight if the Supreme Court thinks they’re okay.  Now, that may be reading too much into what could be a coincidence.  But when it comes to the Bush administration serving its own interests under the guise of fighting terror and at the expense of our freedoms, I’m not inclinded to give much benefit of the doubt.

Im back

And boy, do I have some complaints for you.  I have complaints about American Airlines first, who decided that I didn’t need to get to Vegas Thursday night, but that getting me there Friday afternoon without so much as an apology was just fine.  I have complaints about the place where we’re getting married, who have now charged my credit card twice when they were only owed once, and a complaint about Discover, who blocked the first charge, then let a duplicate charge go through two weeks later, putting me over my limit.  I also have complaints about Vegas, primarily that it was way too hot and I didn’t win every time I played craps, but those are probably not really so legitimate.

In any event, I will be posting the saga of our trip out there soon.  It’ll be fun, just wait.

John Scalzi on marketing

Whatever: How (And How Not) To Market To Me When I’m in Blogger Mode

I think I’ve linked to John Scalzi’s blog before.  He’s a science fiction writer and a blogger and I’m sure some other things, too.  This particular post is about two different marketing pitches, and why one’s bad and one’s good.  The basic idea of his post is that mass marketing, even when it’s trying to be slick (Or maybe especially if it’s trying to be slick), comes off as being intrusive and doesn’t work.  At least not on smart people like us.  But if you take a minute to show that you know a little about the person you’re marketing to, and then offer something worthwhile, people will listen.

I understand that companies want to sell their products.  I don’t fault them for wanting to make a buck.  But intrusive marketing drives me up the wall.  My blog doesn’t have a following like Scalzi’s (yet), so I’m not on anyone’s radar (Except for a few F’ing spammers).  But if I get to that point, I’ll probably react a lot like he did.

By the way, sending me free stuff is always encouraged.  If you send me free stuff, I promise to review it on the site.  I don’t promise that anyone will read it, and I don’t promise to review it positively, but I promise to review it honestly.

Thats what Ive been trying to tell you

Daily Kos: Happy Blogosphere Day!

The most telling part of this whole post is the final line: “Our biggest enemy isn’t the GOP. It’s our own inaction.”  That’s exactly my problem.  Both with everyone else, and with myself.  I complain, and I vote, but that’s about it.  I need to find a way to get more involved.

Actually, I think I should run for office.  I’ll destroy bi-partisanship and return the government to the people.  Would you vote for me?

CNN ticker is crazy

Anyone have the CNN headline widget on their Google homepage? I do. Someone over there has a weird sense of humor, because they like to juxtapose the weirdest articles. Currently, they have these three headlines displayed:

I mean, sorry, John, I loved Grosse Pointe Blank, but your stalker is not headline news. Good luck with that, though.

Failure or success?

You may know that I’ve been trying to get a more balanced view of the news.  I realized recently that everything I read has a pretty liberal slant, and I want to see the other side.  Both because I agree with a lot of conservative ideas, and because seeing both sides of an issue helps you regardless of which side you’re on.

So tell me if I’m better off now – I don’t like reading either side.  I read the National Review, and all I hear is, “President Bush is doing the right thing, why can’t you stupid liberals see that?”.  Then I read the Daily Kos and I see, “President Bush is destroying the world.  Why can’t you stupid conservatives see that?”.  I’m sick of it all.

What happened to the idea of public service?  What happened to the idea that we’re going to do what’s right for the people, not what the leaders of the political party you affiliate yourself with think serves their interests.

When I first registered to vote in Maryland when I was 18, I registered as a Democrat, mostly because my parents are Democrats, and Maryland requires you to register with a party to vote in the primaries.  Did that mean that I was ruled by the Democratic party?  No.  It means that I chose to associate with them because, in general, their ideas matched up with mine, and they had a much bigger voice than I do.  Later, I considered myself a Republican, because my views changed, and now I agreed with more Republican ideas.

Today, I will not associate myself with either party.  Politics is too much about the party, and about the fighting for the superiority and power of one over the other, and too often the people are forgotten.